The Russian proposals to NATO and the USA and why they should not be rejected

On December 17 the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs released to the public two draft agreements,one concerning measures to ensure the security of the Russian Federation and member-states of  NATO and the other concerning security  guarantees between the USA and the Russian Federation.

Both draft agreements mention,along with many other security arrangements, that NATO should refrain from any further enlargement of NATO including the accession of  Ukraine and other states.The draft agreement with the USA is more specific.Article 4 mentions:”The United States of America shall undertake to prevent further eastward expansion of NATO and deny accession to the Alliance to the States of the former Union of Soviet Socailts Republics.”

What the Russian Federation is actually proposing is what Moscow  was promised by the West in 1990 in order to agree to the reunification of Germany..Let us go back and see what exactly happened then.

On January 31,1990 the German Foreign Minister Hans Dietrich Genscher made his famous speech in Tutzing  Bavaria in which he mentioned : …whatever happens to the Warsaw Pact,an expansion of NATO territory to the East,in other words,closer to the border of the Soviet Union,will not happen.”(source The US and NATO non-extension assurances of 1990-new light on old problems?Marc Trachtenberg,Nov.25,2020

In the joint press conference on February 2,1990 after the meeting between James Baker and Genscher,the latter stated:”..Perhaps I might add we were in full agreement that there is no intention to extend the NATO area of defense and security to the East.This holds true not only for the GDR,which we have no intention of simply incorporating,but that holds true for all other Eastern countries.”Source is the same as above.

Read also:
Strategic Thinkers Who Warned for NATO Expansion

In the Memorandum of conversation between Gorbachev and Baker of February 9,1990 ,Baker says to the Soviet President,”We understand the need for assurances to the countries in the East.If we maintain a presence in a Germany that is part of NATO,there would be no extension of NATO’s jurisdiction for forces of NATO one inch to the east.”(Source. 1616-document-o5-memorandum-conversation -between   Also US Department of State,FOIA 1995045676.) The same is mentioned in the Soviet transcript of the conversation that belongs to the Gorbachev foundation.

In the Memorandum of Conversation between Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl on February 10 1990,,the latter states “We believe that NATO should not expand its scope.”(Source 16120-document-09-memorandum-conversation-between  )

So during the conversations of 1990 it was promised both by Germany and the USA to Moscow that there would be no further expansion of NATO to the East.This promise of course was never kept.What Moscow is now asking is the implementation of what the West had promised it in 1990.Russia is accepting that all the former Warsaw Pact countries remain in NATO,but wants NATO to stop its eastward expansion,which makes sense,since in this way the encirclement of Russia by NATO will be prevented.We must also not forget how the USA reacted when the Soviet Union placed long range missiles in Cuba.There was almost a nuclear holocaust.

The statements made yesterday in Lithuania, by the German Defense Minister Christine Lambrecht that “We will discuss Russia’s proposals…But it cannot be that that Russia dictates to NATO partners their posture “,indicate either that there is a lack of  historical knowledge  in this respect,or that Germany is unwilling to accept what it had proposed in 1990 to Moscow..In either case the rejection of the Russian proposals by NATO and Washington will bring the doomsday clock forward to the detriment of humanity.One can only hope that logic-or what is left of it, prevails.

Read also:
Russia-Ukraine war: The western threat of nuclear annihilation

Leonidas Chrysanthopoulos
Ambassador ad honorem
Aigion,Greece   20.12.2021

We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers  in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.