The Rift Between the U.S. and China Is a Global Health Hazard

By Fred Guterl

Athletes competing at the Winter Olympics in Beijing got first-hand experience of China’s prowess in controlling COVID-19 outbreaks. Unlike the often vague and inconsistent public-health policies of the U.S., Beijing has perfected the art of the lockdown. Athletes were strictly cordoned off from the outside world, required to wear masks and submit to daily tests, and isolated in their rooms upon a negative result.

The safeguards did more than merely protect athletes from infection. They also protected China’s newfound reputation as a competent steward of global public health in a pandemic crisis.

The idea that China, less than 20 years since bungling the SARS outbreak, has raised its game to world-class standards might be cause for celebration. A Chinese public-health system that is alert to pandemic pathogens and can bring the best technology and know-how to early warning of new viruses should be reassuring not just to the people of China but to the rest of the world. Yet China’s strategy of relying on strict lockdown measures to keep the Omicron variant at bay may not be sustainable in the coming months. And animosity between the U.S. and China raises concerns about the world’s prospects for battling future outbreaks.

In the realm of pandemic prevention, cooperation is key. Nations are far better at fighting pandemics when they collaborate than when they go it alone. The COVID-19 pandemic may have hurt the world’s ability to fight the next pandemic, rather than improved it, in large part because U.S.-China relations have deteriorated.

Read also:
G.M. Drops Its Support for Trump Climate Rollbacks and Aligns With Biden

Continue reading at www.newsweek.com

We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers  in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.