Chinese FM responds to US telling citizens to leave Iran immediately and White House stating military options on the table
Jun 13, 2026
China consistently opposes interference in other countries’ internal affairs and opposes the use or threat of use of force in international relations and we hope that all parties will do more to contribute to peace and stability in the Middle East, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Mao Ning told a regular news briefing on Tuesday.
Mao made the remarks when asked to comment on an inquiry on developments that the US has told its citizens to leave Iran immediately and at the same time, the White House stated that military options against Iran have been put on the table, as well as that US media reports indicated that options including cyber warfare and psychological warfare are also under consideration.
China hopes and supports Iran in maintaining national stability, the spokesperson noted.
Published at www.globaltimes.cn
White House: US Airstrikes Against Iran Are ‘On the Table’
According to media reports, Trump is ‘leaning towards’ bombing Iran while considering diplomacy, though it’s unclear what sort of deal he would accept
The White House said on Monday that US airstrikes against Iran are “on the table” as President Trump has continued his threats to bomb the Islamic Republic amid protests in the country.
“One thing President Trump is very good at is always keeping all of his options on the table,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. “And airstrikes would be one of the many, many options that are on the table for the commander-in-chief.”
Leavitt added that “diplomacy is always the first option for the president,” though Trump backed an Israeli attack on Iran during the last round of nuclear negotiations back in June. “The president has shown he’s unafraid to use military options if and when he deems necessary, and nobody knows that better than Iran,” Leavitt said.
On Sunday night, Trump suggested Iran had reached out to discuss the possibility of holding negotiations and suggested he was open to diplomacy, but also said he was considering “very strong” options. Iran’s Foreign Ministry said that the “communication channel” between Trump’s envoy, Steve Witkoff, and the Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi remains open.
Axios and The Wall Street Journal both reported on Monday that Trump was leaning toward bombing Iran but was still exploring the possibility of negotiations. However, it’s unclear what sort of diplomatic deal would satisfy Trump as he continues to shift the pretext for potentially launching another war.
In recent weeks, Trump has threatened to bomb or support an Israeli attack on Iran if it rebuilds its civilian nuclear program or “continues” its conventional missile program, and has repeatedly threatened to attack the country if Iranian authorities kill protesters. The Axios report said that if Trump decides to bomb Iran, the strikes would likely target elements of Iran’s government responsible for internal security.
Iran’s position is that it doesn’t seek war with the US, but it’s warning that it will strike back if Trump follows through on his threat. “If Washington wants to test the military option it has tested before, we are ready for it,” Araghchi told Al Jazeera.
The Telegraph reported over the weekend that amid the threats of US airstrikes on Iran, the US military has conveyed to President Trump that it needs time to position assets in the region to prepare for Iranian counterattacks, which would likely involve missile strikes on US bases.
Iranian government sources have said more than 100 security personnel have been killed in the ongoing protests, suggesting there have been significant attacks against Iran’s security forces. The Human Rights Activists News Agency (HRANA), a US-based and US-funded NGO, has also reported 133 military and law enforcement deaths, among a total of 646 people it claims to have been killed.
Published at news.antiwar.com
We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.
