US intelligence chief says Iran’s regime ‘intact’ but ‘degraded’

The top intelligence official in the US said on Wednesday that the Iranian regime was “intact” but “largely degraded”.

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and other top Trump administration officials testified at a congressional hearing for more than two hours about worldwide threats to the US.

It was the first public briefing on intelligence since the war began in late February and came one day after a top counterterrorism leader resigned saying Iran had not posed an imminent threat to the US.

Gabbard, who coordinates the country’s intelligence operations, also said that the US had anticipated trouble in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping channel.

Appearing alongside the heads of the CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and Defense Intelligence Agency, Gabbard declined to answer when asked repeatedly by Senator Jon Ossoff, a Democrat, about whether she had viewed Iran as an imminent threat.

“The only person who can determine what is and is not an imminent threat is the president,” she said.

Since the war began, lawmakers and commentators from both parties have questioned why the US struck the Islamic Republic and if the Trump administration was aware of potential problems in the Strait of Hormuz on the southern coast of Iran. President Donald Trump has said the US attacked largely because Iran was developing nuclear weapons, which threatened the US and Israel.

On Tuesday, Joe Kent resigned from his role as director of the national counterterrorism center, saying in a publicly posted resignation letter that Iran had posed “no imminent threat” to the US and criticising Trump for the war.

CIA Director John Ratcliffe testified on Wednesday that he did not agree with Kent.

“I think Iran has been a constant threat to the United States for an extended period of time, and posed an immediate threat at this time,” he said.

Gabbard said US and Israeli strikes in the Middle East had “largely destroyed” Iran’s military capabilities.

She also said the intelligence community had assessed that “Iran was trying to recover from the severe damage to its nuclear infrastructure sustained during the 12-Day War and continued to refuse to comply with its nuclear obligations”.

The US and Israel attacked Iran over 12 days in June 2025 with the aim of destroying possible capabilities to produce a nuclear bomb.

In written remarks prepared for the hearing, Gabbard had asserted those attacks “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment programme, and Iran had made “no efforts” to rebuild it. But she did not read that assertion aloud.

When Democratic Senator Mark Warner asked Gabbard about the omission, she said she had to trim her public remarks because they were “running long”.

“So you chose to omit the parts that contradict the president,” Warner responded, pointing Trump’s contention that military action against Iran was justified because of its nuclear-weapon development.

Lawmakers also asked how involved intelligence officials were in Trump’s decision to strike Iran. Senator Angus King, an Independent from Maine, asked if they were “in the room” with Trump as he made his “final decision”.

Ratcliffe estimated he was in “dozens and dozens” of meetings with the president, but did not know if there was a “single time where a decision was made”.

King also asked if intelligence officials had informed Trump that Iran could potentially attack the Strait of Hormuz during a conflict with the US. Iran has effectively shut down the vital oil shipping channel since the US-Israel war with Iran began.

“The president gets briefings constantly about intelligence,” Ratcliffe said. He added that the Pentagon prepared for Iran to hit “US interests in energy sites across the region” and “took measures for force protection”.