“We will consider every appropriate tool in our continuing fight to stop the Willow climate bomb,” said one advocate.
By Kenny Stancil
Following his administration’s Monday morning approval of the Willow oil drilling project, environmental justice advocates slammed U.S. President Joe Biden for betraying the voters who sent him to the White House and vowed to do everything in their power to stop ConocoPhillips from proceeding with its climate-wrecking venture on federal land in Alaska’s North Slope.
“President Biden’s decision to move forward with the Willow project abandons the millions of young people who overwhelmingly came together to demand he stop the project and protect our futures,” Sunrise Movement executive director Varshini Prakash said in a statement. Young voters, overwhelmingly opposed to expanding fossil fuel extraction, played a key role in securing Biden’s 2020 victory and in minimizing the Democratic Party’s losses in the 2022 midterms.
On the campaign trail in 2020, then-candidate Biden “committed to end new oil and gas drilling on public lands and waters,” said Prakash. “Today’s announcement flies in the face of that promise. Instead of sticking to his own goals and listening to the millions of young people who carried the party for the last three cycles, President Biden is letting the fossil fuel industry have their way.”
Save the Arctic. #StopWillow https://t.co/0F3zJblAoq pic.twitter.com/PuzwXKwjrk
— GGJ (@ggjalliance) March 13, 2023
Dorothy Slater, director of climate research at the Revolving Door Project, also condemned Biden for once again reneging on his unfulfilled pledge to halt drilling on federal lands.
“The Willow project in Alaska is the largest oil extraction project ever proposed on federal lands,” Slater pointed out. “Biden’s green light for this drilling project, which his own Interior Department had ‘substantial concerns‘ about, is political and cowardly. And last-minute half-measures to conserve other areas of Alaska and the Arctic Ocean are insulting in the face of a betrayal of this magnitude.”
“Biden and the fossil fuel-friendly advisers who have his ear are choosing to actively perpetuate massive harm to Alaska ecosystems and our shared atmosphere,” said Slater. “ConocoPhillips, faced with the reality of melting permafrost, plans to artificially cool the ground so it can drill for oil that will further heat the planet. The infrastructure needed for the project will fragment delicate Alaska Arctic ecosystems. People living nearby will be made victims of the inevitable human health hazards associated with leaks and transportation emissions.”
Noting that residents of the Alaska Native village of Nuiqsut “suffered from headaches, breathing problems, and nausea… in the wake of last year’s North Slope gas leak,” Allie Rosenbluth, U.S. program manager at Oil Change International, called the White House’s move “a tremendous strike against President Biden’s legacy on both climate and environmental justice.”
“Biden has again broken his campaign promise to stop oil and gas drilling on federal lands and is approving new drilling at a faster rate than the Trump administration,” said Rosenbluth. “The Willow project would be a colossal source of climate pollution, emitting a whopping 278 million metric tons over the next three decades—equivalent to the annual emissions of one-third of all remaining U.S. coal plants.”
“The United States has no claim to international climate leadership if it’s approving deadly new fossil fuel projects that could operate for decades,” Rosenbluth asserted. “It’s time for the Biden administration to stop investing in disaster and instead invest in a just transition to reliable, affordable, and renewable energy for all.”
As Slater observed, “News media has repeatedly cited support from Alaska Natives… who have expressed that the jobs and revenue from the project are necessary to fund basic services for residents.”
“But there is serious resistance from at least 38 Indigenous-led organizations and the neighboring Native village of Nuiqsut, who say the process for public input has been inadequate and that the project threatens their way of life,” she noted. “A functioning country with a visionary president would realize alternative paths to fund basic services that didn’t rely on a poisonous fossil fuel project with huge anticipated costs to people and planet.”
We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.