President Donald Trump said he could shoot someone on Fifth Avenue and not lose a single voter. The press called it hyperbole. His opponents called it proof of insanity. His supporters called it Tuesday.
Everyone missed the point.
Trump was not boasting. He was explaining his theory of power. The theory is simple: The rules do not apply to him because he has convinced everyone — allies and enemies alike — that he does not play by any rules at all.
He is not crazy. He is strategic. And the strategy is working.
The absurdity as armor
Trump says things that no normal politician would say because he understands something that normal politicians do not. Normal politicians are constrained by the fear of looking ridiculous. Trump is not. He has weaponized absurdity.
When he called for banning all Muslims from entering the country, the press was outraged. His opponents were horrified. His supporters shrugged. The policy was never implemented. It did not need to be. The goal was not to ban Muslims, but to demonstrate that he was willing to say what no one else would say. That demonstration was the message.
The message is always the same: I am not afraid. I do not care what you think. I will say anything. And you cannot stop me.
That is not craziness. That is a calculated display of fearlessness.
The contradiction as confusion
Trump contradicts himself constantly, sometimes in the same sentence. His opponents collect these contradictions like trophies and present them as evidence of incompetence. They are wrong.
When Trump says one thing on Monday and the opposite on Wednesday, his opponents spend Tuesday and Thursday trying to figure out what he “really” believes. They write think pieces, they hold strategy sessions, they tie themselves in knots trying to reconcile the irreconcilable.
Trump does nothing. He waits. He moves on to the next contradiction. He lets his opponents exhaust themselves chasing a consistency that does not exist.
This is the firehose strategy at its purest: flood the zone with so much contradictory noise that the opposition cannot focus on any single threat.
Why he likes being called crazy
Trump calls himself crazy, embracing the label and wearing it like a medal.
This is strategic positioning. When your opponents have spent years calling you crazy, you have two options. You can defend yourself, which legitimizes the frame and forces you to play defense. Or you can own the label, which disarms the attack and puts you back on offense.
Trump owns it, the attack bounces off, and the weapon is useless.
The trap Democrats keep falling into
Democrats have spent nearly a decade trying to prove that Trump is crazy, unfit, dangerous, and unworthy of office. They have compiled evidence, made legal arguments, and appealed to decency, to norms, to the rule of law.
None of it has worked. Not because the evidence is weak, but because the strategy misunderstands the game.
Trump is not running for president of a civics class. He is running for president of a country where half the population has stopped believing in institutions, stopped trusting the media, and started treating politics as a team sport where winning is the only thing that matters.
Democrats keep trying to appeal to a shared reality that no longer exists. Trump understood this before anyone else.
The cold hard truth
Trump is not crazy. He is not stupid. He is not a chaos agent with no plan. He has a plan, and it has been working for nearly a decade. And his opponents still do not understand it.
The plan is simple:
1. Say things that shock the conscience and dominate the news cycle.
2. Contradict yourself constantly to keep the opposition confused.
3. Embrace every attack, turning your opponents’ weapons into decorations.
4. Repeat until the opposition exhausts itself.
5. Win.
Until Democrats figure out what game Trump is actually playing, they will keep losing and Trump will keep winning.
*Craig Anderson is an independent journalist and author under pen name Will Hart.
We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.