By Al Jazeera Staff and Reuters | 28 May 2026.
The Trump administration has sought to pressure international officials who scrutinise reported abuses by Israeli forces.
The United States government has returned the UN’s expert on the occupied Palestinian territory, Francesca Albanese, to a list of sanctioned individuals after a judge had granted a temporary injunction against the designation.
On Wednesday, an update appeared on the US Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) website, indicating that Albanese had been added to the agency’s list of Specially Designated Nationals (SDN), without offering further details.
Albanese’s criticism of Israeli policies has made her a target under US President Donald Trump.
In July 2025, Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a statement announcing sanctions against Albanese, accusing her of “lawfare” and “biased and malicious activities” against Israel.
He also cited her recommendation that the International Criminal Court (ICC) should issue arrest warrants against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Minister of Defence Yoav Gallant, which it ultimately did in November 2024, amid Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza.
Sanctioning Albanese was just one in a series of actions the Trump administration has taken against critics it sees as hostile to US and Israeli interests.
The sanctions barred Albanese from entering the US and froze her assets in the country. They also prevented any US-based entity from doing business with her.
Albanese, an Italian citizen, has close ties to the US: Her daughter is a US citizen, and the family maintains a residence in the country.
‘Nothing more than her opinion’
In February, members of Albanese’s family filed a lawsuit on her behalf, stating that the sanctions had disrupted her life, even preventing her from accessing her bank account.
The lawsuit also accused the Trump administration of trying to intimidate those who speak out against Israeli rights abuses.
On May 13, US District Judge Richard Leon ruled in favour of the Albanese family’s lawsuit, granting a temporary injunction against the sanctions.
Leon found that the Trump administration had used the penalties to curtail Albanese’s constitutionally protected speech. He also stated that Albanese could not be blamed for the ICC’s actions.
“It is undisputed that her recommendations have no binding effect on the ICC’s actions,” Leon wrote. “They are nothing more than her opinion.”
As a result of the ruling, Albanese was removed from the sanctions list this month.
But the Trump administration appealed Leon’s order. It also said it would restore her to the sanctions list as soon as it was able.
On Friday, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued an administrative stay of Leon’s ruling, allowing the government to once again enforce Albanese’s designation as a sanctioned foreign national.
The appeals court order said the administrative stay was procedural and “should not be construed in any way as a ruling on the merits” of the government’s broader request to halt the lower court injunction during the appeal.
Albanese has been vocal in her assessment that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza, a view echoed by leading human rights experts around the world. More than 75,000 Palestinians have been killed in the territory since 2023, when Israel launched its genocidal war on the Strip.
Albanese is not alone in facing economic penalties for her work.
Since taking office for a second term, Trump is estimated to have issued sanctions against nine ICC judges, as well as prosecutors for the court.
The judges and prosecutors were reportedly involved in probes into abuses by US and Israeli forces.
Legal experts have condemned the sanctions as an assault on international law and an effort to shield the US and its allies from scrutiny.
We remind our readers that publication of articles on our site does not mean that we agree with what is written. Our policy is to publish anything which we consider of interest, so as to assist our readers in forming their opinions. Sometimes we even publish articles with which we totally disagree, since we believe it is important for our readers to be informed on as wide a spectrum of views as possible.